 |
 |
design
evolution |
 |
 |
 |
Supported from below, the most common type of bridge utilizes a
series of deep beams or trusses anchored at each end of the span.
However, because of the clearances under the span required by the
railroad, the bridge deck elevation would end up being almost 35
feet above the street.
|
 |
 |
|

Original program sketch
|
|
 |
 |
|
In order to substantially decrease the distance from the street
to the bridge deck, the thickness of the structure must be minimized.
Constructed of conventional means, this would prove both impracticable
and uneconomical. The thickness required to reduce the height is
a fraction of that found in a conventional span. Without any additional
system of support, the deck would sag, or deflect. To meet the design
criteria, the additional system of support would not thicken the
deck or obstruct the required clearances below.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Hanging the deck from above was the best way to meet the design
criteria. In a typical cable-stayed bridge, a thin deck is supported
symmetrically from above by cables connected to a mast.
|
 |
|
Study models
|
|
 |
 |
|
Site constraints, utility configurations as well as complex and
overlaying easements offered the opportunity to develop unique design
and cable geometry. Our solution places the mast to one end of the
bridge and arrays the cables from the mast to both the bridge deck
and grade, This design employs the thin deck structure reducing
the elevation from the street by 10 feet.
|
 |
|

Structural concept model
|
|
 |
 |
continue |
 |
 |
|